Uproar as President Tinubu Bypasses constitutional protocols, ignores NJC, Appoints Kogo as New CCT Chairman

Uproar as President Tinubu Bypasses constitutional protocols, ignores NJC, Appoints Kogo as New CCT Chairman

 

In a move sparking nationwide controversy, President Bola Tinubu has appointed Dr. Mainasara Umar Kogo as the new Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), reportedly bypassing constitutional protocols.

 

The appointment, conveyed in a letter dated January 20, 2025, and signed by Senator George Akume, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, has drawn criticism for its alleged disregard of the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

 

The constitution mandates these bodies to handle judicial appointments through a rigorous process of nomination and evaluation.

 

To compound the controversy, the appointment was backdated to November 27, 2024, raising questions about transparency and adherence to due process. Critics argue that the move undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent for executive overreach.

 

This development follows a tumultuous period for the CCT. In July 2024, former presidential spokesperson Ajuri Ngelale announced Kogo’s impending assumption of the chairmanship despite the tenure of Justice Danladi Umar, the substantive chairman, still being active. Justice Umar, who faced attempts by the National Assembly to remove him, had initiated legal proceedings to challenge what he termed a politically motivated campaign against his tenure.

 

The appointment of Dr. Kogo has reignited debates about the independence of the judiciary and the government’s commitment to constitutional principles.

 

According to the constitution, the FJSC nominates candidates for judicial positions, while the NJC evaluates and recommends suitable candidates to the President for final approval. However, NJC spokesperson Festus Akande, speaking to PRNigeria, disclosed that no such consultation took place regarding Kogo’s appointment, as he was on annual leave and unaware of any related meetings.

 

Legal experts and political analysts have expressed concerns that this unilateral action undermines the delicate balance of power and accountability between the judiciary and the executive. “This is not just a matter of process; it is a matter of principle. Disregarding constitutional provisions creates an atmosphere of impunity,” one analyst noted.

 

As the debate unfolds, the lawsuit involving Justice Umar, President Tinubu, Attorney-General of the Federation Lateef Fagbemi, and Senate President Godswill Akpabio continues to progress in the Federal High Court in Abuja. Observers believe the court’s rulings on the matter could have significant implications for the separation of powers in Nigeria’s democracy.