BREAKING: Court Orders FG to Take Over Jonathan’s Multi-Billion Naira Abuja Housing Estate

The ruling effectively transfers ownership and control of the stalled project to the Federal Government, bringing to an end years of controversy, inactivity, and allegations of financial misconduct surrounding the estate.

0

Advertisements

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has ordered the permanent forfeiture of a multi-billion-naira housing estate earlier approved in honour of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

 

The ruling effectively transfers ownership and control of the stalled project to the Federal Government, bringing to an end years of controversy, inactivity, and allegations of financial misconduct surrounding the estate.

 

The judgment, delivered on December 11 by Justice Mohammed Umar, followed a motion filed by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC). The anti-corruption agency had approached the court seeking a final forfeiture of the disputed land, arguing that it constituted proceeds of unlawful activity and that urgent action was required to safeguard public interest.

 

Advertisements

The property in question is the Goodluck Jonathan Legacy Model Housing Estate, a large-scale housing project located in the Kaba District of Abuja. The estate was initially conceived as part of the National Housing Fund (NHF) Scheme and was designed to deliver 962 affordable housing units for low-income Nigerians. More than a decade after its approval, however, not a single housing unit has been built on the expansive site, despite the release of substantial public funds.

 

Justice Umar, in his ruling, ordered that the land be finally forfeited to the Federal Government. He further directed that the ICPC should supervise the completion of the housing estate on behalf of the government, working jointly with the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN). According to the court, this arrangement is necessary to ensure transparency, accountability, and adherence to the original purpose of the project.

 

“The essence of this forfeiture is to protect public interest and recover value from a project that has consumed huge public funds without delivering commensurate benefits,” the judge said.

 

Advertisements

The Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria, which was listed as the sole respondent in the case, did not oppose the ICPC’s application. The court recognised FMBN as the victim of the alleged illegal transactions tied to the project and ordered that the forfeited properties be formally handed over to the bank for onward management in line with government directives.

 

The forfeited assets include two major plots of land in the Kaba District. One plot measures approximately 122,000 square metres and was valued at nearly ₦2 billion, while the second spans about 157,000 square metres with an estimated value of over ₦3.3 billion. Justice Umar held that both plots were reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activity, given the circumstances under which they were allocated and the manner in which public funds were expended.

 

As part of the ruling, the court also ordered the ICPC and FMBN to jointly establish a committee that will oversee the completion of the housing estate. The committee is expected to ensure that the project is executed in line with its original design and that, once completed, the housing units are allocated strictly to Nigerians who genuinely need affordable housing.

 

Advertisements

Justice Umar stressed that the proposed 962 housing units must not be diverted from their original purpose. He warned that any attempt to misuse or misallocate the estate in_toggle would defeat the very objective of the forfeiture and undermine public confidence in government housing initiatives.

 

The ruling represents the culmination of a legal process that began earlier in the year. In July, the court had granted an interim forfeiture of the same plots after the ICPC filed an ex parte application. At the time, Justice Umar ordered that the land be secured pending the final determination of the case, citing the risk that the property could be sold off or otherwise disposed of before the court reached a conclusion.

 

Investigations by the ICPC revealed troubling details about the origin and execution of the project. Court documents showed that the land was allocated free of charge by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) specifically for the construction of the housing estate under the National Housing Fund Scheme. The project received official approval in 2012 and was named after then-President Goodluck Jonathan as a legacy initiative aimed at expanding access to affordable housing.

 

According to the ICPC, the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria engaged Good Earth Power Nigeria Limited as the private developer responsible for executing the project. To finance the development, FMBN reportedly secured a loan facility of 65 million dollars, which was fully disbursed to the developer.

 

However, investigations revealed that despite the release of the entire loan amount, no construction activity took place on the site. There was no evidence of groundwork, foundation laying, or any other form of development consistent with a project of such magnitude.

 

The ICPC further informed the court that the developer allegedly attempted to sell portions of the land to members of the public, raising serious concerns that the property could be permanently lost if decisive action was not taken. The agency argued that allowing the land to remain in private hands under such circumstances would amount to a grave injustice to Nigerians, particularly low-income earners who were the intended beneficiaries of the project.

 

In his judgment, Justice Umar questioned the payment structure that allowed the full project cost to be released upfront without adequate safeguards. He noted that such an arrangement exposed public funds to significant risk and made it difficult to enforce accountability once the money had been disbursed.

 

The judge agreed with the ICPC’s position that forfeiture was necessary to prevent further losses and to preserve the property for public use. He described the case as a clear example of how weak oversight and poor financial controls can undermine well-intentioned public projects.

 

The ruling has been welcomed by anti-corruption advocates, who see it as a strong signal that the judiciary is prepared to support efforts to recover mismanaged public assets. It also raises broader questions about project monitoring, due diligence, and the mechanisms used to protect public funds in large-scale government initiatives.

 

As the Federal Government moves to take full control of the estate, attention will now shift to the implementation of the court’s orders. For many Nigerians, particularly those in need of affordable housing in Abuja, the hope is that the long-abandoned project will finally be revived and completed, turning a symbol of waste and controversy into one of accountability and public benefit.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Verified by MonsterInsights